How to get into link roundups
- Link roundups are recurring curated posts with a permanent appetite for fresh content, making them a repeatable rather than one-off link source.
- Roundup links are editorially given, so they sit on the right side of Google's spam policies in a way paid links do not.
- Find them with title and time-bound search operators, then filter for roundups that have actually published in the last 60-90 days.
- You need something worth curating first; the pitch comes second and should reference a specific recent edition.
- Outreach is a numbers-and-follow-up game: only about 1 in 12 emails gets a reply, but one follow-up can lift replies by roughly 66%.
On this page
To get into link roundups, find active curators in your niche with Google operators like intitle:"roundup" "your topic" after:2026-01-01, publish one genuinely standout asset worth curating, then send a short, specific pitch that names a recent edition of their roundup and explains why your piece fits. Roundups are one of the few link types Google still treats as cleanly editorial, which is why they remain worth the work in 2026.
This guide walks through the full workflow: what roundups are, how to find live ones, what to publish before you pitch, the outreach itself, and the realistic numbers you should expect. It sits inside our wider link building playbook, so treat it as the roundup-specific deep dive rather than a general primer.
What link roundups actually are (and why they still work)
A link roundup is a recurring blog post, usually weekly or monthly, where a curator collects the best content published in their niche and links out to each piece. Think "This Week in SEO," "Best Marketing Reads of the Month," or "Friday Favorites." The curator does this every cycle, which means they have a permanent, recurring appetite for fresh content to feature. That is the structural reason roundups are such a reliable link source: the demand never stops, so the same curator can link to you again and again over the years.
Crucially, roundup links are editorially given. The curator chooses what to include based on quality and relevance, with no money or product changing hands. That distinction matters more than ever. Google's spam policies single out "buying or selling links for ranking purposes" and "excessive link exchanges" as link spam, and require any link obtained through payment or commercial arrangement to carry rel="sponsored" or rel="nofollow". A clean roundup feature sits on the right side of that line because it would exist even if search engines did not. As analysis of Google's backlink policy puts it, the real test is simple: would this link exist if rankings did not matter? For a good roundup feature, the answer is yes.
Roundups vs. resource pages vs. guest posts
Step 1: Find roundups that are actually still running
The single biggest mistake people make is pitching dead roundups. Thousands of "weekly roundup" series were abandoned years ago, and emailing them is pure waste. Your goal is to build a list of roundups that published an edition recently, ideally in the last 60 to 90 days. Start with Google search operators, which let you target the title and the date at the same time.
| Search operator | What it surfaces |
|---|---|
| intitle:"roundup" "link building" after:2026-01-01 | Recent posts with "roundup" in the title for your topic |
| intitle:"weekly roundup" + your niche | Series that publish on a weekly cadence |
| "best of" intitle:"this week" + your niche | Curated "best of the week" posts |
| intitle:"link roundup" inurl:blog + your niche | Roundups living on active blogs |
| "favorite posts" OR "recommended reading" + your niche | Informal roundups that skip the word "roundup" |
Run each query, then apply two filters. First, use Google's Tools > Any time > Past month filter to confirm the series is alive. Second, open the most recent edition and check the date in the post itself, because some sites republish old URLs. Per Outreach Monks, you can widen the net with synonyms: "daily round up," "monthly round up," "notable blog posts," and "favorite blog posts" all pull different curators.
Two faster shortcuts. One, reverse-engineer competitors: drop a rival's URL into a backlink tool and look for referring pages whose titles contain "roundup" or "best of." If a roundup linked your competitor, it covers your niche and may welcome you next. Two, follow hashtags like #linkroundup, #weeklyreads, and #bestof on X and LinkedIn, where curators announce each new edition. To speed the discovery and qualification step, our free link tools can pull and sort prospect lists so you spend your time pitching, not copy-pasting URLs.
Step 2: Build something a curator would actually choose
Here is the uncomfortable truth most roundup guides skip: the link is not won in the email, it is won in the asset. A curator's reputation rides on what they recommend, so they only link to things their audience will thank them for. Before you pitch, you need a piece that earns its slot. In practice that means one of a few formats that curators reliably feature:
- Original data or a small study with a number people will quote (curators love a fresh statistic).
- A genuinely complete "definitive guide" that goes deeper than what already ranks.
- A free tool, template, or calculator readers can use immediately.
- A strong contrarian or experience-based take that adds a new angle to a tired topic.
If your content is interchangeable with ten other posts, no amount of polished outreach will rescue it. This is also where roundups quietly compound: a single linkable asset can be pitched to dozens of roundups over months, so the time you invest in one great page pays out many times. For a sense of what data-led assets attract links at scale, our link statistics hub is the kind of reference page that curators link to repeatedly.
Step 3: The pitch that gets you featured
Roundup outreach lives and dies on relevance and brevity. The curator is busy and assembling their next edition under deadline. Your job is to make their job easier. A pitch that works has four parts: a specific reference to their roundup, one sentence on what your piece is, one sentence on why it fits their readers, and a clean link. No fluff, no flattery padding, no "I hope this email finds you well."
Personalisation is not a nicety, it is the lever that moves your numbers. Backlinko's analysis of over 12 million outreach emails found that personalised messages received 32.7% more replies than non-personalised ones, yet most senders never personalise. The reference to a specific recent edition does double duty: it proves you actually read the roundup and it tells the curator exactly where your piece would slot in.
Watch your anchor text expectations too. You generally do not get to dictate the anchor in a roundup; the curator writes it, usually as your post title or brand name, which is healthy and natural. If you want to understand why that variety helps rather than hurts, see our guide to anchor text and the anchor text glossary entry.
Step 4: Follow up, and respect the real numbers
Outreach is a volume game with a long tail, and the data is sobering if you expect quick wins. The Backlinko and Pitchbox study found that only about 8.5% of outreach emails receive any response at all, which is roughly one reply for every twelve emails. That is not a reason to quit; it is a reason to send more thoughtful pitches and, above all, to follow up.
Following up is the highest-ROI thing you can do. The same study found that sending one follow-up boosted replies by 65.8%, and that emailing the same contact multiple times led to roughly twice as many responses. A clean two-touch follow-up, one nudge around day three and another around day seven, captures most of that upside without becoming a pest. Keep follow-ups even shorter than the first email: "Bumping this in case it is useful for your next roundup."
| Metric | Realistic benchmark | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Reply rate, single email | ~8.5% (1 in 12) | Backlinko / Pitchbox |
| Lift from one follow-up | +65.8% replies | Backlinko / Pitchbox |
| Lift from personalisation | +32.7% replies | Backlinko / Pitchbox |
| Link conversion of cold link-building emails | ~8.5% land a link | Apollo / industry data |
Do not turn roundups into a link exchange
Where roundups fit in a real link strategy
Roundups are a steady, low-risk base layer, not a silver bullet. They tend to produce a stream of contextually relevant links to recently published content, which is great for new pages that need an initial push. What they rarely do alone is move the needle on a competitive head term, because the linking pages are often lower-authority blogs. Pair roundups with higher-authority editorial placements for the pages that matter most. That is exactly the gap ANGLE's DR55 editorial placements are built to fill, and the link pricing index gives you a benchmark for what a quality placement should cost so you do not overpay elsewhere.
It also pays to combine roundups with adjacent tactics that share the same outreach muscle. Broken link building reuses your prospect list and curator relationships; resource pages give your roundup-featured assets a second, evergreen home. One understanding of how editorial links are earned rather than placed underpins all of them.
Frequently asked questions
How long does it take to get featured in a link roundup?
If you pitch a recently published, genuinely strong asset to active roundups, you can land your first feature within one to two weeks, since most run on a weekly or monthly cycle. Expect roughly one reply for every twelve emails, so build a prospect list of 30 to 50 live roundups per asset rather than pitching three and hoping.
Are link roundup backlinks safe under Google's guidelines?
Yes, when they are genuinely editorial. A curator choosing to link to your content because it is good is exactly the kind of link Google's spam policies reward. The risk only appears when roundups become paid placements (which then need a sponsored or nofollow attribute) or reciprocal exchanges, which Google flags as excessive link exchanges.
Do I need new content every time, or can I pitch the same page?
Both. A single high-value asset such as a study, tool, or definitive guide can be pitched to many roundups over several months because it stays relevant. Fresh, newly published content is easier to land in weekly roundups specifically because recency is what those curators are looking for.
What is the best way to find link roundups in my niche?
Combine title-and-date search operators like intitle:"roundup" "your topic" after:2026-01-01 with a Past-month time filter to confirm the series is alive, then reverse-engineer competitor backlinks for referring pages titled "roundup" or "best of." Following niche hashtags on X and LinkedIn surfaces curators who announce each new edition.
Should roundup links be dofollow to be worth pitching?
Dofollow is ideal, but do not skip a relevant, high-authority roundup just because it uses nofollow. Google now treats nofollow as a hint rather than a strict directive, and a feature on a respected site still drives referral traffic, brand exposure, and discovery. Prioritise relevance and authority over the link attribute alone.